Spring Stopper Company, 165 Broadway, MCH. PAT’D FEB. 14 1922

       

The subject bottle, manufactured to accommodate a threaded closure, is machine made and designed such that the threads needed to accommodate the closure are located inside the neck. The bottle is unembossed with the exception of the following patent information found on the neck directly below the lip.

MACH. PAT’D FEB. 14 1922

Almost certainly this refers to U.S. Patent No.  1,406,722 entitled “MACHINE FOR MAKING BOTTLES.” Assigned to the Spring Stopper Company of Brooklyn by Harry M. Brown, it was filed on March 18, 1918 and approved on the date embossed on the bottle, February 14, 1922. This description of the patented machine appeared in the May, 1922 edition of a publication called “The Glass Industry.”

So it’s apparent the bottle’s inside threaded finish was manufactured by a machine protected under this patent.

A March, 1927 advertisement run by the Spring Stopper Company and  found in a trade publication called “The Glass Container,” sung the praises, of this bottle, calling it:

The only machine-made bottle with inside screw thread.

Another advertisement in “The Glass Container,” this one found in their April, 1930 edition, depicted a variety of seals and applicator rods offered in connection with this closure.  The ad included their sales pitch which read in part:

An ethical pharmaceutical, a dainty toilet preparation – each requires a seal or applicator rod widely different in appearance and design.

Spring Stopper Seals and Applicator Rods are now offered in a wide variety of materials which give a selective choice to the manufacturer.

Seals are now available in glass. porcelain, Durez or Bakelite in colors. These seals screw into a thread which can easily be formed on the inside neck of your bottle. They make a perfect closure and reclosure. Now used by many nationally known companies, particularly for such difficult to seal products as hydrogen peroxide, camphorated oil, highly volatile substances.

The Spring Stopper Company, originally of Brooklyn, was organized in 1909 with the announcement appearing in the July 23rd edition of the “Brooklyn Daily Times.”

The Spring Stopper Company, of Brooklyn, has been organized with the State Department to manufacture bottles, jars, etc. The capital stock is placed at $10,000 consisting of shares of $100 each, and directors for the first year are Luke V. Lockwood of Greenwich, Conn.; Arthur J. Albert of Hoboken, and John T. Duane of Brooklyn.

The company was initially located at 81 Washington Street with Richard Canfield serving as both the president and sole stockholder. The company’s listing appeared in the 1913-1914 Copartnership and Corporation Directory of Brooklyn and Queens.

Spring Stopper Co. (NY) Richard A. Canfield, Pres.; Clayton F. McKenley Sec & Treas., Capital $10, 000., 81 Washington

Canfield passed away suddenly in December, 1914 when he fell, hitting his head on a staircase in a 14th Street station of the New York City subway. The following story published in the December 19, 1914 edition of the “New York Tribune” suggested that prior to his death, Canfield’s company had been accumulating patents in both the U. S. and Canada.

To the Spring Stopper Company, of which Canfield owned all the stock, is bequeathed all his American and Canadian patents, and all debts the company may owe him are cancelled. In payment for the patents the executor is instructed to cause the company to issue to himself sufficient stock to bring its capitalization up to $1,000,000. In this company stock to the value of $50,000 is given to Harry M. Brown, associated with him in its management; twenty-five thousand to his secretary, Clayton F. McKenley, and $25,000 to Thomas W. Sprague with the condition that they not dispose of it without offering it to the executor at a fair appraisal.

Two years later the capital had yet to be increased and was still sitting at $10,000 when, according to the July 16, 1916 edition of the “Brooklyn Citizen:”

John Hill Morgan, as referee, has recommended to the Supreme Court that Vincent Lockwood, executor of the estate of the late Richard A. Canfield, be allowed to invest $35,000 as working capital in the Spring Stopper Company.

The $10,000 capital stock of this company is owned by the estate. The device manufactured is a bottle stopper. Testimony given before the referee showed that Mr. Canfield had invested some $400,000 already in the concern which was about to begin operation when he died.

The additional $35,000 is necessary now to begin operations. Mr. Morgan was told Mr. Canfield intended to increase the capital to $1,000,000 and invest $250,000 as working capital. The referee decided that $35,000. might be invested.

Around the same time, the company moved to 217 Duffield Street in Brooklyn. At this point both Clayton F. McKenley and Harry M. Brown were still involved, McKenley apparently on the administrative and sales end and Brown on the technical end. In fact, between 1917 and 1920 Harry M. Brown obtained approval for at least four different patents, each of which involved bottle manufacturing machines and methods. Brown assigned each of the patents to the Spring Stopper Company.

No. 1,285429, Bottle Stoppering Machine, July 31, 1917; No. 1,292,243, Machine for Making Bottles, Jan. 21, 1919; 1,334,648; Machine Method for Making Carboys or Large Glass Containers1, Mar 23, 1920, and 1,346,528, Glass Serving Instrument, July 13, 1920.

Around 1920 the company moved across the East River to Manhattan where they listed an address of 220 Broadway with McKenley named as the company’s  “representative” in the directories. Between 1920 and 1925, several more bottle related patents were obtained, including the patent dated February 14, 1922.

At least some of the company’s patents were associated with finishing machines that could be attached to various types of automated bottle making machines and, according to a November, 1925 story in a publication called the “American Perfumer & Essential Oil Review,” by then some of those patented finishing machines were built and operational.

The Spring Stopper Co. owns and controls machines which can be equipped to various types of bottle-making machines for making the inside screw finish, which it lets out on a royalty basis to bottle manufacturers. At present, the only company licensed to do this is the Salem Glass Works

The February 14, 1922 patent was certainly associated with one such machine.

The “American Perfumer & Essential Oil Review” story went on to say that at the time the Spring Stopper Company, now located at 165 Broadway, was promoting their business at the Sesquicentennial Exhibition in Philadelphia.

Spring Stopper Co., New York City, is one of the progressive exhibitors in the Sesqui-Centennial Exposition at Philadelphia in Building No. 2, near the Red Cross Booth. The exhibit has been a source of interest to visiting manufacturers in the toilet preparations and allied trades who have stopped to examine the large array of bottles of various sizes and shapes with the inside screw stopper shown by the company…

The booth was under the able direction of Miss Marie Martin, who  explained to visitors that the reclosure bottle is produced as economically as ordinary bottles by an automatic machine process. Its various advantages were also explained.

The story identified the Salem Glass Works as the company licensed to manufacture bottles using the Spring Stopper Company’s patented machines, a fact confirmed by this  November, 1926 advertisement found in “The Glass Container.”

The two companies apparently maintained a close relationship throughout the late 1920’s and early 1930’s, so much so that the Spring Stopper Company’s 1933 New York City directory listing specifically identified the company with the Salem, New Jersey location while simply listing a room number at their 165 Broadway address in Manhattan.

This all suggests 165 Broadway served as the company’s sales office while their finishing machines had been incorporated into the Salem Bottle Works operations.

It doesn’t appear that the Spring Stopper Company’s machine-made version of the inside threaded finish was all that successful. As far as I can tell, advertisements for the company and their finish vanish by the mid-1930’s and I don’t see many of their bottles advertised on e-bay. Additionally, in 20+ years on the bay I’ve only found the one pictured. That being said, as late as 1946 the Spring Stopper Company was listed in the NYC directories at 165 Broadway.

The subject bottle is approximately 5 inches tall and 1-3/4 inches in diameter. Brown in color, it gives the appearance of a pharmaceutical bottle.

An advertisement published in the May, 1929 edition of a publication called  “Drug Markets” suggested it could have held a hydrogen peroxide brand called “MOONSHEEN,” manufactured by the Schuykill Chemical Company or a “Camphor Liniment,” manufactured by the H. E. Mulford Co.

Other advertisements, including this March 1927 advertisement in “The Glass Container,” also mention Parke Davis & Co. as a pharmaceutical client (lower left-hand side below) so that’s another possibility.

Hamilton Glass Works, N. Y.

The Hamilton Glass Works in New York was a short-lived Brooklyn based business operated by a partnership called D. O. Ketcham & Co. Their factory was generally located adjacent to the Gowanus Canal, on the east side of  Smith Street, near or at the intersection of Hamilton Avenue. The company  was only operational from 1851 to 1854.

The business had its beginnings with a man named Daniel O. Ketchum who, in the late 1840’s, served as an agent for the Albany Glass Works. This advertisement bearing his name and title appeared in the April 11, 1849 edition of the “Buffalo Courier Express.”

On or about May, 1, 1851, with the Albany Glass Works no longer in business, Ketchum formed a partnership with Charles H. Cole and John M. Scott to manufacture glass.  According to Ketchum’s testimony in in the case of George Catlin against Charles H. Cole, John B. Thursby, Robert G Thursby, James S. Thursby and Samuel J. Thursby; N.Y. Court of Appeals; 1861:

About two years previous to that time, I had been connected with the Albany  Glass Works, as agent for that company in Albany. Their business was the manufacture of glass. Mr. Cole had no experience in the glass business. He was a ship-chandler….  Scott was a practical glass-maker… It was arranged that I should manage the business principally.

The name was suggested by its location on Hamilton Avenue….

Ketchum’s testimony went on to say that sometime in the latter part of May, or early part of June, 1851, they commenced building their Brooklyn factory.

We built a large factory with the necessary outbuildings, for the purpose of manufacturing glass. The tools, etc., purchased from the Albany Glass Works, were removed  to this factory, and afterwards used there. Mr. Cole resided in Albany, and continued to carry on his ship-chandlery business. I left Albany, with my family, about the 1st of July, 1851, and came down here immediately… I think we commenced manufacturing about the 1st of September, 1851.

It was also sometime in 1851 that the company opened an office across the East River in Manhattan. After a short stay at 59 Pearl Street, in 1852 the office moved to 59 Cortlandt Street, also in Manhattan. This item announcing the move appeared in the May 5, 1852 edition of the “New York Herald.”

The following advertisement, exhibiting their new office address, listed a wide range of glassware being produced at the glass works. It included demijohns, druggists’ glass vials and carboys as well as wine, porter, mineral water and patent medicine bottles. The ad appeared in the September 15, 1852 edition of “The Springfield (Mass.) Daily Republican.”

Ketchum’s testimony went on to point out that the company actually manufactured glassware for less than two years.

The partnership between myself, Scott and Cole was dissolved July 1, 1853. Scott at that date, went out and Cole and myself continued on – not in the manufacturing business, but in the purchase and sale of glass, and selling glass on commission.

Less than a year later the business was insolvent and, on April 14, 1854, an agreement to dissolve the firm was executed.

Ketcham subsequently transitioned into the “oil” business and for the next ten years continued to list the glass factory location, Smith c. Hamilton, as the address for that business. Then sometime in the mid-1860’s members of the Hagerty family apparently took possession of the factory.  According to “Glass Firms of the Hagerty  Brothers,” by Bill Lockhart, Bill Lindsey, Carol Sera and Beau Schriever, the Hagerty’s had been in the glass business as a jobbers since 1849 and planned to use the factory to supply  glass to their sales outlet.

As early as 1865/1866 the firm of Haggerty, Gardiner & Burrows was listed in the N. Y. C. directory on Smith Street with the occupation “glass manufacturer.”  At this point the factory was named  the Brooklyn Green Glass Works, as evidenced by this classified ad published in the August 27, 1867 edition of the “Brooklyn Daily Eagle.”

Over the next 25 plus years, the business operated under several different Haggerty controlled companies including B. B. Hagerty & Co. (circa 1870 to 1876); Hagerty Bros. & Co. (1878 to 1890); and A. J. Hagerty & Co. (1890’s). That being said, by the early 1870’s the business was generally referred to as simply the Hagerty Glass Works. Their advertisement appeared in the 1875/1876 Brooklyn city directory…

…and a rendering of their facility appeared in the business section of the same directory

Ultimately, a story in the January 7, 1894 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle indicated that the plant shut down in June, 1893 due to poor economic conditions..

The glass making industry fell on evil times during 1893. The green glass works of A. J Hagerty & Co., Smith Street, in fair seasons usually gave employment to two hundred and fifty hands. These works have been shut down since June. James F. Haggerty says he does not know when they would open up again. The depression was general throughout the country…

Whether the glass works reopened again is unclear but either way the end was certainly in sight and by March/April of 1900 Brooklyn Daily Eagle classified ads announced that the Hamilton Avenue facility was up for sale.

The subject bottle is small, maybe six to eight ounces and emerald green. Blown in a mold, it exhibits an improved pontil scar. The embossing is faint but readable with “Hamilton Glass Works” appearing in an arch over “N.Y.” The lettering of the “N. Y.” is slightly larger than that of “Hamilton Glass Works.” The bottle certainly dates between Sept, 1851 and  June, 1853 when glass was manufactured there under that name.